What is the appropriate action when a client expresses a threat towards a third party?

• A. Ignore the threat to avoid escalating the situation
• B. Discuss options with the client
• C. Report the client to the police immediately
• D. Confront the client about their feelings of anger

Answer: (B)

When a client expresses a threat towards a third party, discussing options with the client is an appropriate and therapeutic response. This approach allows the clinician to engage the client in a dialogue about their feelings and the situation, which can help to assess the seriousness of the threat and the context surrounding it.

By discussing options, the clinician can gather more information about the client's state of mind and motivations, offer support, and explore alternative ways to cope with their feelings. This dialogue also establishes trust and reinforces the therapeutic relationship, which is crucial for effective counseling.

Additionally, addressing threats to third parties often requires careful consideration, including the need for risk assessment and potentially informing the appropriate authorities if there is a credible and immediate risk. This response does not dismiss the seriousness of the threat and allows the clinician to take necessary precautions while maintaining a supportive environment.

In contrast, ignoring the threat could put the third party at risk and negate the counselor's ethical responsibilities. Reporting the client to the police immediately might escalate the situation without understanding the full context. Confronting the client may lead to defensiveness and hinder open communication, which is essential for effective therapeutic intervention.